|
Acacia Technologies adopts, acquires and permits patented technologies.
Acacia’s Digital Media Transmission or “DMT” technology includes the
transmittance and reception of digital audio and/or audio video
substance. These include the internet, cable, satellite, and local area
networks. Constituents of the DMT transmission process include a source
material library, identification encoding process, format conversion,
sequence encoding, compressed data storage, and transmission. Features
of the DMT receiving process include a transceiver, format conversion,
storage, decompression, and playback.
The online adult industry is covered by Acacia Technologies and it is
now seeking approval of a class action lawsuit against the entire Adult
Internet Industry. Acacia claims to have a patent on all information
streamed or downloaded over the Internet. If allowed Acacia will have
the power to process whether their patents are valid to a single company
rather than against the entire industry. Meaning, if Acacia wins, they
will be at your doorway asking for money.
The strong-arm strategy of Acacia, effectively wants to put a tax on
every single person using the Internet for video-on-demand services,
Internet radio, pay-per-view movies, video news clips from sites like
CNN.com, and even songs from iTunes or Amazon.com.
Acacia is making an offensive attempt to target the adult industry in
its effort to get unwarranted fees for alleged infringement of its
patents. With this lawsuit everybody using the Internet is at risk. The
adult industry will be greatly affected by this. Acacia wants a cut of
everything that moves on the Internet. If they win, everyone will pay
the price for Acacia's raiding practice, as Acacia's "tax" will be
passed on to users.
How to win against Acacia
The Adult Industry gives different options on how to deal with Acacia’s
lawsuit. First option, the License Agreement demands webmasters to pay
Acacia a royalty fee amounting to a percentage of gross receipts
realized from the Website containing the streaming content. This choice
basically puts you into business with Acacia, with whom you will be
sharing revenues. An accounting of revenues may be asked to know that
Acacia is getting its "fair share." This option will decrease the
webmasters' bottom line, but in a known percentage. For those webmasters
who do not want to gamble, this option will eradicate all risk on a
go-forward basis, and quantify any exposure to liability for past patent
violation.
The second option is to join a defense group. A number of adult media
firms have joined a group of industry players who have chosen to fight
against the validity of Acacia's patent claims. Some members of the
group have already been litigated, and are actively in litigation. Those
who have not been litigated can ask for an opinion letter from defense
counsel, regarding the validity of Acacia's patent claims in regard to
the actual technology being used by any particular Website for streaming
video.
Some Adult Webmasters affected by the Acacia issue always have the
option to hire their own personal patent attorney. Webmasters looking
for such representation should make sure that any candidate for legal
counsel is a "registered patent attorney." The field of patent law is
highly specialized. Attorneys should not paddle in a field like patent
litigation. Webmasters are advised to only consider patent attorneys who
have had years of experience processing patent claims in federal court.
Fourth option is you can negotiate with Acacia independently. Acacia has
no obligation to pull off the terms of its License Agreement; but
nothing prevents that from happening. There may actually be different
settlement privileges that come into play, preventing the admissibility
of such statements, however a webmaster treads on dangerous ground if he
or she decides to get into a substantive discussion with a spokesperson
of Acacia regarding the issues of video streaming, or any other relevant
legal fact.
Attorneys can manage such issues without the fear of making binding
admissions, or giving away sensitive information that could bear on
potential defenses. Therefore it is always advisable to utilize the
services of an attorney when embarking on such negotiations. Another
point is the disadvantage that a webmaster is at, compared to a member
of Acacia's legal staff. Acacia holds all the cards in the dialogue, and
discussing patent claims with its spokespersons will be the same to
negotiating with someone who speaks another language. It may be hard for
the webmaster to know if any particular terms being proposed are fair or
reasonable.
Acacia and null patent claims
Some webmasters are trusting that the "court case" involving Acacia will
be decided soon, and that its patent claims will be nullified. This is
an unrealistic expectation, since the litigation against the existing
defendants is in its early stages. No substantive rulings have occurred
to date with regards to the enforceability of Acacia's patents. It could
be years before a final verdict is handed down, once a trial has
occurred and all appeals have been consumed. Nothing significantly
impacts the viability of the adult Internet industry, despite attacks
from within. The industry will continue to exist, and it is in Acacia's
best interests that it does, if this firm intends to base its future
profits on royalties received from successful players.
|